Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
89/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
E. coli WGS (whole-genome amplified). Good reusability (grade B) despite elevated duplication at 21.94% (scored 56/100)—the primary drag from WGA library prep. Q30 is solid (92.6%) and adapters minimal, permitting use in assembly and variant discovery if copy-number analysis is not required.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0