← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
44/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Cucumis sativus
Instrument
454 GS FLX
Platform
LS454
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
8 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
707341627
reported
total reads
1752774
reported
n content pct
0.045
measured
pct q20 bases
83.9
measured
pct q30 bases
62.2
measured
gc content pct
42.9
measured
mean read length
320.8
measured
mean base quality
30.6
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
12.29
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 44/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
62.2
measured
×1
0%
mean base quality
30.6
measured
×0.6
43%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
12.29
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
21 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0