← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Taeniopygia guttata
Instrument
454 GS
Platform
LS454
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
18 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
445433274
reported
total reads
4076748
reported
n content pct
0.037
measured
pct q20 bases
88.5
measured
pct q30 bases
24
measured
gc content pct
39.5
measured
mean read length
103.8
measured
mean base quality
26
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
10.56
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 33/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
24
measured
×1
0%
mean base quality
26
measured
×0.6
0%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
10.56
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
4 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0