PRJNA175224

BioProject

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

29/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Homo sapiens

Instrument

Illumina MiSeq

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

11 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 1309563445 reported

total reads 5742323 reported

mean coverage 0.4 extrapolated

n content pct 0 measured

pct q20 bases 79 measured

pct q30 bases 62.4 measured

gc content pct 46.2 measured

mean read length 122.8 measured

mean base quality 28.5 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 0.34 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 29/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

mean coverage 0.4 extrapolated ×1.2 0%

pct q30 bases 62.4 measured ×1 0%

duplication rate pct 0.34 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 8 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0