Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
This 454 GS FLX amplicon dataset from anaerobic digester metagenome samples contains 350,894 reads and 117 million bases with remarkably high quality (99.3% Q20, 99% Q30), supporting robust profiling of methane-producing and fermentative communities. The 53.7% GC and amplicon-based approach enable taxonomic binning and functional prediction relevant to biogas production and waste-treatment optimization. Reusers should confirm the amplicon target and digester operating conditions (temperature, feedstock) to contextualize findings for their systems.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0