Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 12 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
12 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Hybrid amplicon data from archived SOLiD platform. Grade F, 33/100—unsuitable for reuse. Only 30.5% of bases meet Q30, with mean quality 22.7 (0/100 score), representing catastrophic base-quality failure violating every variant-calling threshold. This dataset cannot support reliable genomic inference.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0