← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
50/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
bulk-RNA-seq
Organism
Urodacus manicatus
Instrument
454 GS FLX Titanium
Platform
LS454
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
1 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
43126878
reported
total reads
76540
reported
n content pct
0.007
measured
pct q20 bases
88
measured
pct q30 bases
65.2
measured
gc content pct
42.8
measured
mean read length
349
measured
mean base quality
32
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
29.54
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 50/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
65.2
measured
×1
0%
mean base quality
32
measured
×0.6
67%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
duplication rate pct
29.54
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
12 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0