← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
82/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Escherichia coli
Instrument
AB 3730 Genetic Analyzer
Platform
CAPILLARY
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
12,618 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
4075889946444
reported
total reads
10656054161
reported
n content pct
0.008
measured
pct q20 bases
93.8
measured
pct q30 bases
84.6
measured
gc content pct
38
measured
mean read length
290.1
measured
mean base quality
34.3
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
15.18
measured
mean target coverage
44303151.6
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 82/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
84.6
measured
×1
73%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
37 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0