PRJNA212644

BioProject first seen 2020

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

84/100 · B

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Short-read bacterial WGS scoring B-grade (84/100) with Q30 at 84.2% (measured, scored 71/100)—sitting at the lower usable threshold for genomics. Acceptable for bacterial reference assembly and core-genome analysis, though marginal for variant discovery; organism's inherent robustness (Latilactobacillus) helps offset modest base-quality ceiling.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

Latilactobacillus curvatus F16_9

Instrument

Illumina HiSeq 2000

Platform

ILLUMINA

Read type

short-read

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

4 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 2022367036 reported

total reads 10011718 reported

n content pct 0.015 measured

pct q20 bases 91.2 measured

pct q30 bases 84.2 measured

gc content pct 42.1 measured

mean read length 101 measured

mean base quality 33.3 measured

adapter content pct 0.13 measured

duplication rate pct 9.09 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 84/100

The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 84.2 measured ×1 71%

duplication rate pct 9.09 measured ×0.5 97%

adapter content pct 0.13 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 44 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0