← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 4 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
4 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Escherichia coli
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 1000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads), BAM/CRAM (aligned)
N numbers (samples, groups)
20,073 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
8478233682818.001
reported
total reads
21764286097
reported
n content pct
0.094
measured
pct q20 bases
94.3
measured
pct q30 bases
92.6
measured
gc content pct
38.1
measured
mean read length
179.4
measured
mean base quality
36
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
15.97
measured
mean target coverage
92154713.9
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 100/100
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
92.6
measured
×1
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
9 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0