Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
65/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Spongilla lacustris bulk RNA-seq with poor measured quality (D grade). High adapter contamination at 17.14% and Q30 only 82.1% jointly compromise reliability and introduce false signals. The combination risks spurious low-abundance transcripts and adapter-driven artifacts; recommend extensive trimming and QC filtering, or resequencing.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0