← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 6 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
6 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Zoogloea sp. LCSB751
Instrument
454 GS FLX
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
189 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1505194044851
reported
total reads
5958195976
reported
n content pct
0.009
measured
pct q20 bases
94.9
measured
pct q30 bases
91.5
measured
gc content pct
42.2
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
36.2
measured
adapter content pct
24.92
measured
duplication rate pct
35.8
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 67/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
91.5
measured
×1
100%
adapter content pct
24.92
measured
×0.5
0%
QC cost
8 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0