← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
33/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Phocaeicola dorei
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
947 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
79246105910
reported
total reads
392307455
reported
n content pct
0.046
measured
pct q20 bases
61.7
measured
pct q30 bases
50.9
measured
gc content pct
54.9
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
22.4
measured
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
duplication rate pct
61.13
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 33/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
50.9
measured
×1
0%
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
8 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0