Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
13/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Homo sapiens amplicon (HiSeq 2000); grade F—not recommended for reuse. Adapter contamination of 17.14% is extreme, meaning >1/6 of reads are non-insert sequence that will pollute target mapping and variant calls. Q30 of 73.9% adds further noise; target coverage (684.9×) is extrapolated and not measured, making depth claims provisional.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0