PRJNA237745
BioProjectProvenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 0 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
No linked papers found in the corpus yet.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq (Trichodesmium erythraeum cyanobacterium) with B-grade score (83/100). Excellent base quality (Q30 92.8%, mean 35.8) and robust reads (101bp) are undermined by extreme duplication (81.06%, scoring 0/100), indicating over-amplification. Usable only with aggressive duplicate removal; transcript quantification will require independent validation due to amplification bias.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0
Scientific quality
Based on hands-on reproduction of the papers that use this dataset. A reproducible paper that stands on this data is positive evidence; a flagged one is a prompt to look closer — never a verdict on the dataset itself without the evidence.
- Benefit from decline: the primary transcriptome of Alteromon...⚑ L1 No data access ⚑