Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
87/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Extreme-depth whole-genome sequencing of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast) via HiSeq 2000 with extraordinary extrapolated coverage of ~3817×, spanning ~206M reads. This dataset is optimal for detecting rare mutations, structural variants, and heterozygous sites in a widely-used model organism with a ~12 Mb reference genome. The exceptional depth enables variant calling at very low allele frequencies and high-confidence consensus genome finishing.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0