Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Homo sapiens amplicon sequencing (454 platform) with good measured quality (B grade). Q30 at 86.3% meets amplicon standards, and adapter content is absent. However, mean target coverage is only 5.4× (extrapolated, pending deep measured pass)—marginal for rare-allele detection; recommend coverage validation before heavy reuse.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0