← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
89/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Salmonella enterica
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
108 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
42296656847
reported
total reads
80140045
reported
n content pct
0.009
measured
pct q20 bases
94.5
measured
pct q30 bases
85.7
measured
gc content pct
52.4
measured
mean read length
280.2
measured
mean base quality
34.6
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
7.69
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 89/100
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
85.7
measured
×1
79%
duplication rate pct
7.69
measured
×0.5
100%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
10 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0