Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
39/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of vaginal metagenome via Ion Torrent PGM with ~4.1M reads at moderate quality (71.8% Q30), representing targeted amplicon profiling of female urogenital microbiota. This dataset enables taxonomic profiling of health-associated bacterial communities and can address questions about microbiota composition in reproductive health. The modest read depth and lower Q30 rate suggest careful taxonomic filtering will be necessary before interpreting rare taxa.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0