Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
78/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Phytophthora rubi (a oomycete plant pathogen) via HiSeq 2500 with ~106M short reads at excellent quality (96.5% Q30, 0% N content). This dataset enables genomic characterization of this crop pathogen relevant to host-pathogen interactions and fungicide resistance. The high quality and large read count support confident assembly of the complex oomycete genome and identification of pathogenicity-associated genes.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0