Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
86/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
16S/18S rRNA amplicon sequencing of Sus scrofa domesticus (domestic pig) associated metagenome via MiSeq with ~9M short reads at moderate quality (85.9% Q30). This dataset enables taxonomic profiling of swine microbiota relevant to livestock health and nutrition studies. The modest read count and moderate quality suggest sequencing of specific body sites or limited sample multiplexing, suitable for targeted surveys rather than comprehensive microbiota characterization.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0