← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
0/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Danio rerio
Instrument
Illumina MiSeq
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
4 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1667521200
reported
total reads
5558404
reported
n content pct
0.083
measured
pct q20 bases
75.1
measured
pct q30 bases
66.5
measured
gc content pct
44.4
measured
mean read length
150
measured
mean base quality
29.5
measured
adapter content pct
36.76
measured
duplication rate pct
94.08
measured
mean target coverage
55.6
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 0/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
66.5
measured
×1
0%
adapter content pct
36.76
measured
×0.5
0%
QC cost
11 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0