Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
86/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Fungal bulk RNA-seq from Exserohilum turcicum achieves B-grade QC (86/100) with strong base quality (Q30=94%) but one critical issue. Adapter content of 16.59% scored only 19/100 and dominates the grade penalty—incomplete trimming can artificially inflate transcript counts and should be remediated before quantification. Reuse is possible with upstream adapter-trimming after re-QC.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0