Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
98/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Hybrid short+long WGS of grass plant achieving A-grade (98/100) with Q30 at 89.4% (measured) as the marginal limiting metric. Long-read mean length (251 bp) and minimal duplication (1.09%) enable superior scaffolding and assembly—hybrid approach leverages strengths of both chemistries for plant genome recovery.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0