Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
45/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read WGS of bacterium with F-grade (45/100) driven by catastrophic Q30 failure at 42.7% (measured, scored 0/100)—nearly half of bases fall below Phred 30. Not reusable for any quality-sensitive application (assembly, variants, mapping); metrics likely reflect 454 sequencer platform limitations or hardware malfunction rather than typical errors.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0