← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
Mus musculus
Instrument
Illumina Genome Analyzer IIx
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
10 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
152949552
reported
total reads
1514352
reported
n content pct
0.004
measured
pct q20 bases
99.3
measured
pct q30 bases
97.2
measured
gc content pct
61.2
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
37
measured
adapter content pct
72.65
measured
duplication rate pct
80.43
measured
mean target coverage
2.8
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 67/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
97.2
measured
×1
100%
adapter content pct
72.65
measured
×0.5
0%
QC cost
2 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0