← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
67/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
amplicon
Organism
soil metagenome
Instrument
454 GS FLX
Platform
LS454
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
344 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
1018028924
reported
total reads
2283497
reported
n content pct
0.014
measured
pct q20 bases
93.5
measured
pct q30 bases
80.1
measured
gc content pct
70
measured
mean read length
470.3
measured
mean base quality
35
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
49.22
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 2 scored metric(s) → 67/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
80.1
measured
×1
51%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.5
100%
QC cost
3 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0