← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 6 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
6 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
56/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Citrobacter braakii
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
421 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
470911884794
reported
total reads
1706584938
reported
n content pct
0.001
measured
pct q20 bases
96
measured
pct q30 bases
89.4
measured
gc content pct
51.8
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
34.9
measured
adapter content pct
13.52
measured
duplication rate pct
37.13
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 56/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
89.4
measured
×1
97%
duplication rate pct
37.13
measured
×0.5
9%
adapter content pct
13.52
measured
×0.4
11%
QC cost
5 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0