PRJNA260533

BioProject first seen 2018

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

32/100 · F

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

Data type / assay

bulk-RNA-seq

Organism

Tityus bahiensis

Instrument

454 GS Junior

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

4 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 270124336 reported

total reads 502899 reported

n content pct 0.009 measured

pct q20 bases 74.9 measured

pct q30 bases 45.4 measured

gc content pct 36.9 measured

mean read length 425 measured

mean base quality 27.7 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 32.62 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 32/100

The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 45.4 measured ×1 0%

mean base quality 27.7 measured ×0.6 0%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

duplication rate pct 32.62 measured ×0.4 94%

QC cost 23 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0