Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Short-read amplicon of rat gut microbiome with perfect 100/100 despite 96.98% duplication (measured)—expected PCR amplification bias in amplicon sequencing. Outstanding Q30 (95.2%, measured) and zero adapters indicate clean amplification; high duplication is amplicon-appropriate and does not compromise abundance profiling or taxonomy inference.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0