Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
44/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
WGS on 454 GS FLX Titanium for Apilactobacillus kunkeei offering longer individual reads than contemporary short-insert libraries but with lower per-base accuracy (85.8% Q20, 61.5% Q30). Historical platform data remains valuable for validating previous assemblies and comparing long-read technologies across bacterial genomes.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0