Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
74/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Apilactobacillus kunkeei via HiSeq 2000 with ~13.6M short reads and 83.6% Q30. This dataset supports genome assembly of this bee-associated lactic acid bacterium relevant to apiculture and bee health. The moderate read count and Q30 rate are adequate for bacterial genome finishing, though variants near low-complexity regions may require careful validation.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0