PRJNA271123

BioProject first seen 2015

Provenance — who produced it, who reused it

Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.

Reused by

1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.

Deep data QC

74/100 · C

Standardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured

What this means

claude:haiku

Metagenome from 454 platform (outdated technology) with Q30 80.1% moderately constraining reuse and longer reads (256 bp mean) as a strength. Platform obsolescence and modest Q30 require careful tool selection. Usable only if 454-compatible pipelines available.

Data type / assay

WGS

Organism

hot springs metagenome

Instrument

454 GS FLX Titanium

Platform

LS454

Files available

FASTQ (raw reads)

N numbers (samples, groups)

2 runs

Metrics (value · how obtained)

checksum ok yes reported

total bases 202616132 reported

total reads 481810 reported

n content pct 0.023 measured

pct q20 bases 92.9 measured

pct q30 bases 80.1 measured

gc content pct 59.3 measured

mean read length 256 measured

mean base quality 35 measured

adapter content pct 0 measured

duplication rate pct 7.45 measured

How this grade was computed

Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 74/100

The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.

pct q30 bases 80.1 measured ×1 51%

duplication rate pct 7.45 measured ×0.5 100%

adapter content pct 0 measured ×0.4 100%

QC cost 39 s compute

measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0