Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
86/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Hybrid-read WGS on HiSeq 2500 (short + long reads) for Allofrancisella guangzhouensis with high quality (97.3% Q20, 91.8% Q30) and low GC content (31.1%). The hybrid approach overcomes limitations of short-read-only assembly, enabling gapless genome reconstruction and resolution of repetitive regions in this bacterium.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0