← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 3 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
3 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
66/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WES
Organism
Homo sapiens
Instrument
Illumina HiSeq 2000
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
short-read
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
41 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
231097764175
reported
total reads
1147069586
reported
n content pct
10.225
measured
pct q20 bases
42.3
measured
pct q30 bases
21.8
measured
gc content pct
47.3
measured
mean read length
101
measured
mean base quality
14.3
measured
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
duplication rate pct
15.62
measured
mean target coverage
3727.4
extrapolated
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 4 scored metric(s) → 66/100
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WES thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
mean target coverage
3727.4
extrapolated
×1.2
100%
pct q30 bases
21.8
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
15.62
measured
×0.5
89%
adapter content pct
0.01
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
7 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0