Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of Aedes aegypti (dengue mosquito vector) microbiome via MiSeq with ~51M short reads at exceptional quality (98.5% Q30, 0% N content). This dataset enables high-confidence taxonomic profiling of arthropod-associated bacterial communities and vector competence studies. The superior quality and amplicon approach are ideal for resolving microbiota differences between wild and laboratory-reared mosquitoes.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0