Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
43/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq of Hypsibius dujardini (tardigrade/water bear) via HiSeq 2000 with ~302M short reads, but notably very high N content (0.453%) and lower base quality (74.1% Q30). This dataset captures the transcriptome of an extremophile organism adapted to desiccation and radiation resistance. The high N content and moderate quality suggest data quality issues, requiring aggressive quality filtering before reliable transcript quantification and assembly.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0