Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
100/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
16S/18S rRNA amplicon sequencing of plant-associated metagenome via MiSeq with only ~2.8M short reads at excellent quality (95% Q30, 0.002% N content). This dataset enables taxonomic profiling of fungal and bacterial endophytes or rhizosphere communities in plants. The modest read count suggests targeted single-sample sequencing or low-diversity communities, requiring verification of experimental design for accurate interpretation.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0