Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
88/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Hybrid short and long-read whole-genome sequencing of Shigella boydii (enteric pathogen) via MiSeq with ~125M reads and 94.8% Q30, combining read lengths for improved assembly. This dataset enables comprehensive genomic characterization of a diarrheal pathogen relevant to virulence and antibiotic resistance studies. The hybrid approach and high read count support telomere-to-telomere genome reconstruction with confident variant calling.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0