Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
21/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of human metagenome via HiSeq 2000 with ~91M reads but notably poor base quality (only 47% Q30 and 0.013% N content), representing extremely degraded or problematic sequence data. This dataset is severely quality-compromised and requires substantial filtering before reliable analyses. Researchers should exercise extreme caution and implement aggressive quality control thresholds before attempting assembly, variant calling, or community profiling from this dataset.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0