Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
83/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
E. coli reference WGS of B grade; while pct_q30_bases=100% (measured) and adapter content is low (3.69%, measured), the elevated duplication rate (23.64%, measured) suggests possible PCR bias or contamination and will compress coverage uniformity. All metrics measured with evidence_strength=1; suitable for reference genome validation and comparative genomics with caveats on coverage distribution.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0