Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
81/100 · BStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Good-quality amplicon metagenomics with adequate Q30 (84.9%, weight-1 metric, scored 74/100) and minimal adapter contamination (1.75%), grading B. High duplication (81.1%) is amplicon-expected. Solid for microbial profiling, though Q30 is borderline for rare-taxa taxonomy; reuse conditional on lenient thresholds.
The B grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0