Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
69/100 · DStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
RNA-seq with poor base quality (Q mean: 29.5%, Q30: 83.9%, both measured) indicating library degradation. Reuse not recommended for quantitative work; posterior filtering cannot recover poor signal quality.
The D grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0