Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
75/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome sequencing of Bacteroides finegoldii DSM 17565 via 454 GS FLX (unspecified instrument) with ~360k long reads spanning ~99 Mb. This dataset supports long-read genome assembly of an obligate anaerobic gut bacterium relevant to microbiome function and bile acid metabolism. Long-read sequencing is particularly suited for resolving repetitive prophage regions and genomic islands common in Bacteroides species.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0