← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
47/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Bacteroides eggerthii DSM 20697
Instrument
454 GS FLX
Platform
LS454
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
16 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
568251524
reported
total reads
2257896
reported
n content pct
0.007
measured
pct q20 bases
93
measured
pct q30 bases
24.9
measured
gc content pct
45.4
measured
mean read length
243.7
measured
mean base quality
27.6
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
8.5
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 47/100
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
24.9
measured
×1
0%
duplication rate pct
8.5
measured
×0.5
98%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
1 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0