Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
93/100 · AStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Massive 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing of Streptococcus dysgalactiae via HiSeq 2500 with ~340M short reads generating unprecedented depth for this bacterial taxon, though at moderate quality (87.8% Q30). This dataset enables extremely sensitive taxonomic profiling and within-taxon microbial diversity detection, particularly useful if rare strain variants are targets. The high N content and moderate Q30 suggest filtering low-quality reads will be necessary before taxonomic assignment.
The A grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published amplicon thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0