← Dataset search
Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 2 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
Reused by
2 further papers cite this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
72/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Data type / assay
WGS
Organism
Achromobacter sp.
Instrument
GridION
Platform
ILLUMINA
Read type
hybrid (short+long)
Files available
FASTQ (raw reads)
N numbers (samples, groups)
3,131 runs
Metrics (value · how obtained)
checksum ok
yes
reported
total bases
2226269862568
reported
total reads
4436251942
reported
n content pct
0.052
measured
pct q20 bases
92.2
measured
pct q30 bases
85.5
measured
gc content pct
32.7
measured
mean read length
145.3
measured
mean base quality
32.9
measured
adapter content pct
0
measured
duplication rate pct
27.61
measured
How this grade was computed
Weighted mean of 3 scored metric(s) → 72/100
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
pct q30 bases
85.5
measured
×1
78%
duplication rate pct
27.61
measured
×0.5
39%
adapter content pct
0
measured
×0.4
100%
QC cost
37 s compute
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0