Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
76/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Very large-scale bulk RNA-seq of Eufriesea mexicana (a large carpenter bee) via HiSeq 2000 with ~681M short reads spanning ~130 Gb at 81.3% Q30. This dataset enables comprehensive transcriptome characterization of a solitary bee species with detailed capture of tissue-specific and behavioral gene expression. The exceptional read depth supports isoform discovery and detection of lowly-expressed regulatory transcripts despite moderate Q30 rate.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0