Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
78/100 · CStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Bulk RNA-seq of Dufourea novaeangliae (sweat bee) via HiSeq 2000 with ~229M short reads at 84% Q30, spanning ~43 Gb of sequence data. This dataset enables comprehensive transcriptome profiling of a solitary bee species relevant to understanding social behavior evolution and immune function. The substantial read depth despite moderate Q30 supports isoform reconstruction and detection of behavioral-associated genes.
The C grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published bulk-RNA-seq thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0