Provenance — who produced it, who reused it
Linked to 1 papers in the literature. Roles are inferred factual signals (who deposited the data vs who reused it), with counts — never a judgement about any author.
1 further paper cites this accession but reuse could not be confirmed.
Deep data QC
55/100 · FStandardized, field-standard QC computed by touching the data — every metric states how it was obtained · evidence: measured
Whole-genome shotgun sequencing of groundwater metagenome via MiSeq with ~53M short reads at moderate quality (81% Q30, 0% N content). This dataset captures metagenomic diversity from subsurface environments, supporting metabolic reconstruction of anaerobic microbial communities and detection of rare organisms. The moderate quality and read depth are adequate for taxonomic profiling and gene family annotation.
The F grade is a transparent weighted average. Each metric below scored from 0–100% against the published WGS thresholds, weighted by its importance; nothing is hidden or subjective.
measured = computed from the data · extrapolated/reported = derived or from the repository · dq-1.0